[ad_1]

A COVID-19 vaccination mandate for 12 and older students in the Los Angeles Unified School District has been postponed from this fall to next year.

The Board of Education voted Tuesday to delay the effective date of the mandate to no sooner than July 1, 2023, aligning the district with the state.

The change was recommended by district Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho.

“Today’s vote shows that we are a science-based school district, and the health and safety protocols we adopt are influenced by the expert advice of our medical partners and public health officials,” Carvalho said in a statement.

Last year, California announced it would require all schoolchildren to receive the coronavirus vaccine, and Gov. Gavin Newsom estimated it would take effect for the start of the 2022-23 school year.

But last month, the Newsom administration paused the requirement until at least summer 2023 because school administrators worried they would not have enough time to implement the vaccine mandate.

“We know that students do best when learning in the classroom with their peers,” Carvalho said. “Due to the high vaccination rates among students 12 and older, low transmission rates in our schools and our nation-leading safety measures, we have preserved in-person learning in the safest possible environment.”

Not a Modern Healthcare subscriber? Sign up today.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Explore More

Cross-country comparison in health care price growth: 2000-2020 – Healthcare Economist

[ad_1] How did health care prices change over the past 2 decades. That is the question a paper by Papanicolas (2024) aims to answer, comparing US prices to those from

Dr. Craig Albanese named Duke University Health System CEO

[ad_1] Duke University Health System has named Dr. Craig Albanese as its next CEO. Albanese will move into the top position at the end of March. He will succeed Dr.

NextGen to pay $31M to settle False Claims Act allegations

[ad_1] NextGen Healthcare agreed to pay $31 million to settle allegations that the electronic health record software developer offered kickbacks to attract users, among other alleged False Claims Act violations.